In Japan, there has been a long tradition of collaborative forms of poetry, such as renga and renku. These forms were used in the courts, as well as more common, informal situations. American poetry does not have the same traditions. Yet Renshi combines free verse and collaboration in a new form of linked poetry. In Tokyo, Makoto oka continued the tradition in the 70s, and he later awakened interest in linked poetry throughout the U.S. and Europe.

Not only did curiosity spread about collaborative poetry, but people also adjusted their views in order to become involved in the movement. Linked poetry in a way is a supercharged poetry; we see a poem not just as something to read. In this manner, American poetic traditions contrast with Asian customs. A linked poem shows a lot of how both writers and readers perceive poetry in particular cultures.

            Taking a fair look at "What the Kite Thinks," a linked poem by oka and a few American poets, it is obvious that collaborative dialogue between countries creates a new kind of community. Yet this poetry needs to be examined in the contexts of poetic and cultural traditions, in order to see how it may affect communities. What role does isolation play in creative traditions? What are the strengths and weaknesses of linked poetry within that context, and within the larger view of history? As a poem, it can tell us so much, but the concept of linked poetry may show us what is most fundamental about poetry, and about being human.